Skip to main content

Featured

There's a Deeper Level to this Conversation: As You Tear At Each Other About Who's Sponsoring the Gen Z Protests, or Even if They're Sponsored at All, Watch These Three Videos and Let Me Know What You Think...

The Legacy of Fear: How the Shadow of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Shaped Kenya's Political Landscape In the annals of Kenya's political history, the events of 1969 stand out as a defining moment marked by fear, coercion, and manipulation. The political tension surrounding Jaramogi Oginga Odinga's candidature led to a series of oath-taking ceremonies in Gatundu that forever altered the fabric of Kenyan society. Understanding this historical context is crucial, especially when contemporary politicians attempt to invoke these dark chapters for political gain. The Fear of Jaramogi and the Birth of the Gatundu Oath The roots of the infamous Gatundu oath can be traced back to the fear and propaganda surrounding Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, the former vice-president and then-leader of the opposition. By 1969, the political landscape in Kenya was charged with tension. The assassination of Cabinet Minister Tom Mboya on 5th July 1969 had already set a volatile backdrop. Within this context, Pr

M7 warns media and "chiefs" in State of the Nation address

KAMPALA - President Yoweri Museveni yesterday addressed the nation at the opening of the third session of the 8th Parliament, drawing battle lines with monarchs, the media and the political opposition.

Mr Museveni also made his strongest defence so far of the land give-away scheme, (popularly known in some circles as land bonanza), saying he was “proud” of giving away the land and declared, for the first time, unequivocally that he had personally decided to give away some government land. “I am so proud that I have given Tata (an Indian company) 50 acres of land so that they can add value to my coffee,” he said.

Mr Museveni, who has been involved in battles with the traditional kingdom of Buganda over a proposed new land law, said he will not allow “traditional chiefs” who failed to protect the sovereignty of Africa from colonial invasion to stand in the way of development. The President conspicuously avoided use of the respectful titles of King, Kabaka or Omukama. “I supported the restoration of these traditional chiefs but they must know that they had failed to protect the sovereignty of African societies,” he said adding, “While I support the traditional institutions, I cannot accept that they stand in the way of development. It will not happen, it will not happen.”

His attack on the media and particularly Daily Monitor was possibly the strongest of his about three-hour speech. “[A] newspaper has no right to damage our future. You publish one false story, immediately it is on the Internet and all over the world, you have no right,” he emphasised as he waved a photocopy of an article Daily Monitor published in April 2005 in which the government wanted to give the Dairy Corporation to a Thai investor for a nominal fee of one dollar.

The attack on Daily Monitor newspaper was part of the President’s prepared address. Waving the article, Mr Museveni snapped, “How could I sell Dairy Corporation for one dollar? Am I an imbecile?” He claimed that as a result of the story in Daily Monitor the first investor, a Thai Company Malee Sampran was scared off the project. “What right do such saboteurs have to sabotage our investment? What right do you have to damage our future?” he asked. Daily Monitor investigation at the time found that the investor, Malee Sampran Inc had no money to make the investment, a discovery that helped the government to look elsewhere for the current investors, Sameer Agriculture and Livestock.

Mr Museveni, in his address also indicated that the controversial plan to donate a large section of Mabira central forest reserve, which in April last year caused the death of at least five people including one man of Asian origin and five Ugandans in a public demonstration, is still on the cards. “Mehta (part owners of the Sugar Corporation of Uganda Limited) wanted some land to increase sugar production and employment, some confused groups tried to frustrate these programmes (but) with patience these will be solved,” the President said.

SCOUL applied to the President seeking to be given some 7,300 hectares of the central forest reserve to expand its sugar plantation, an action that sparked a public demonstration in Kampala on April 12, 2007. Mr Museveni also talked about the most pressing infrastructural challenges to date – power and road infrastructure. On power he described as criminals the politicians in the 6th Parliament who failed the construction of a power dam at Bujagali. He said the failure of Bujagali power dam had retarded the rural electrification programme as funds were diverted to subsidise high- cost thermal power production.

On roads Mr Museveni said he had “learnt for the first time two and a half years ago” from his Works Minister John Nasasira that while the roads in Europe are built to last 50 years, the roads in poor countries like Uganda are built to last only 15 years. He took a characteristic swipe at the donors who provide money late and fail to release money for reconstruction in time before the roads collapse. But he revealed that he was investigating whether the unit cost of constructing a kilometre of the third world roads was comparable in Uganda to other countries with similar conditions.

He also announced the formation of three audit committees in his office to carry on further investigation on roads.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Modern Leaders are as failures as the traditional leaders

While it is true that traditional chiefs failed Africans in their joint venture business with the colonisers, the modern leaders have not been any better. Our leaders today are popular in making pointed speeches from bloody soaked platforms. Mr. Museveni is right is what he is saying about the traditional chiefs but wrong in what he is claiming to be doing towards development.

Is it development when an average person cannot access safe water, healthy care and food? It is commonly believed that a crowed Kampala street with Japanese cars is an indicator of economic development. But this is not so, you can find such cars on the street of Adisababa, Mogadishu, Bujumbura, Harare and else where, but these are failing states.

The issue is not whether we were colonised or the lost opportunities, but what we are doing with today’s opportunities. It is now over forty years of flag independence, yet we continues to have our people live under slavery inflicted by our own African leaders who spend beyond they produce on luxury and political patronage. As it was during the regime of traditional leaders,” investors” come today and use our country for self aggrandisement. So nothing has changed except that we now have chiefs known as presidents, there is a flag and national holiday.

In other words we are much more controlled by the neo-colonialism than we were before. We care so much about foreign interests than we do our own. Worse still we don’t seem to even know our national interest, and how can we when our nations are at most dubious and non-existent?

African will find itself only when it finds where it lost its identity. We have been reduced to mere assimilators of whatever rubbish comes to us so long as we get the so called Aid. Our cultural norms are gone, self respect wiped out, decency has been sacrificed on the altar of modernisation; it does not matter anymore to see a once dignified African being swallowed up in foolishness and becoming mere empties drifting by.

The traditional chiefs could not have done more than the modern guards aught to do. Given the means today, we expect more. Better we make traditional institutions more useful in building a more respectable society. Government should be challenged by the failures in the past and make Uganda a country we are proud of. We want to see more positive actions geared at making Ugandans proud of their country. Government should prove that it is not a bad father stealing the milk for the baby. While leaders are assembling in Rome to discuss food, African leaders should be busy distributing seeds, ploughs and water in rural areas to make an African capable of producing more food; even to feed the Europeans who are resorting to eating GMF.

Kayumba David

Peace Activist

Popular Posts